FDA: 13 companies in cities within Los Angeles County received 35 citations in April

Mark Raza Principal Deputy Chief Counsel - FDA - Official Website
Mark Raza Principal Deputy Chief Counsel - FDA - Official Website
0Comments

There were 13 companies in cities associated with Los Angeles County that received FDA citations as a result of 13 inspections conducted in the county in April, according to reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

This is a 62.5% increase over the number of companies cited in the previous month.

Of the 35 citations issued, the most common citations include:

  • Your hazard analysis did not identify a hazard that requires a control.
  • You did not develop an FSVP.
  • You did not document that you conducted an evaluation or reviewed and assessed an evaluation conducted by another entity to determine a foreign supplier’s performance and the risk posed by a food.

Most of the companies cited were involved in the Food and Cosmetics sector.

All of the companies cited should take voluntary actions to correct their managing operations.

The FDA routinely inspects facilities across the nation to determine if the workplace and their products are compliant with FDA-regulated laws and regulations implemented to improve overall public health. Inspection results are then disclosed publicly.

The FDA is a government agency that is primarily responsible for monitoring the production and distribution of human and animal drugs, biological products, medical supplies and tobacco products for safety quality, according to its website.

Companies located within Los Angeles County Cities and the citations they received in April
Company Name Area of Business Inspection Date Issue Cited
CT Fresh Produce, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/04/2024 Develop FSVP
CT Fresh Produce, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/04/2024 Evaluation – performance, risk
Canyon Farms, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/01/2024 Hazard analysis biological, chemical, physical
Canyon Farms, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/01/2024 Evaluation – performance, risk
Canyon Farms, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/01/2024 Supplier verification – establish written procedures
Canyon Farms, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/01/2024 Verification activity before import, periodically
Central Processing, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/12/2024 Critical control points
Central Processing, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/12/2024 Critical limits
Central Processing, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/12/2024 Signed and dated
International Pita Bread, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/04/2024 Personnel
International Pita Bread, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/04/2024 Plant construction and design
International Pita Bread, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/04/2024 Sanitary operations – Plant maintenance
International Pita Bread, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/04/2024 Toxic chemicals – Identified, held, stored
International Pita Bread, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/04/2024 Pest control
International Pita Bread, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/04/2024 Sanitation of food-contact surfaces – Frequency
International Pita Bread, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/04/2024 Sanitation of non-food-contact surfaces – Manner and frequency
International Pita Bread, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/04/2024 Equipment and utensils – Design and maintenance
International Pita Bread, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/04/2024 Storage and Distribution
International Pita Bread, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/04/2024 Human food by-products
La Flor De Mexico, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/25/2024 Manufacturing, processing, packing, holding – Controls
La Flor De Mexico, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/25/2024 Hazard analysis – Identification of hazard
La Flor De Mexico, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/25/2024 Sanitation preventive controls – Implement
La Flor De Mexico, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/25/2024 Process preventive controls – Appropriate (Adequate)
Luxe Seafood, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/08/2024 Importer verification
Nahlah Seaplus, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/24/2024 No HACCP plan
Nahlah Seaplus, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/24/2024 Importer verification
Oceanitan, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/24/2024 Process preventive controls – Appropriate (Adequate)
Rite Aid Southwest Customer Support Center Food and Cosmetics 04/15/2024 Written procedures – holding
Univar Solutions USA, Inc. Drugs 04/12/2024 Lack of quality control unit
Univar Solutions USA, Inc. Drugs 04/12/2024 Written record not kept of program and validation data
Univar Solutions USA, Inc. Drugs 04/12/2024 Review of representative number of batches
Univar Solutions USA, Inc. Drugs 04/12/2024 Master production and control records, batch uniformity
Vank Produce Food and Cosmetics 04/29/2024 Develop FSVP
Victoria Pacific Trading Corporation Food and Cosmetics 04/10/2024 Hazard analysis biological, chemical, physical
WCS Trading, Inc. Food and Cosmetics 04/11/2024 Onsite audit


Related

 -

There were 42,446 lawyers in good standing in cities located within Los Angeles County as of April

There were 42,446 lawyers in good standing in cities located within Los Angeles County as of April, according to the State Bar of California.

Cities located within Los Angeles County have 35,306 lawyers in good standing as of March

Cities located within Los Angeles County have 35,306 lawyers in good standing as of March

Cities located within Los Angeles County saw 35,306 lawyers in good standing to practice law as of March, according to the State Bar of California.

Angelica Alfonso-Royals, Deputy Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services -

How many H-1B petitions were made by employers in Antelope Valley Today publication area during 2024?

In 2024, 67 H-1B petitions were filed by employers located in the Antelope Valley Today publication area, as per data provided by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services via the H-1B Employer Data Hub.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from Antelope Valley Today.